ENERGIZERS by John Bedini, PART 1/2:
20 Bedini-Bearden Years Free Energy Generation extracts from http://www.icehouse.net/john34/bedinibearden.html
Tom Bearden 1984 Simple Free Energy Motor
On this slide, we show a theoretical scheme which several researchers have discovered and used to build simple free energy motors.
In this scheme, we drive an ordinary d.c. series motor by a two wire system from an ordinary battery. The motor produces shaft horsepower, at — say — some 30 or 40 percent efficiency, compared to the power drained from the battery. This much of the circuit is perfectly ordinary.
The trick here is to get the battery to recharge itself, without furnishing normal power to it, or expending work from the external circuit in the process.
To do this, recall that a charged particle in a “hooking” del-phi river moves itself. This is true for an ion, as well as for an electron. We need only make the del-phi in correct fashion and synchronize it; specifically, we must not release the hose nozzles we utilize to produce our del-phi river or waves.
The inventors who have discovered this have used various variations, but here we show a common one. First, we add an “energizer” (often referred to by various other names) to the circuit. This device makes the del-phi waves we will utilize, but does NOT make currents of electron masses. In other words, it makes pure O-dot. It takes a little work to do this, for the energizer circuit must pump a few charges now and then. So the energizer draws a little bit of power from the motor, but not very much.
Now we add a switching device, called a controller, which breaks up power to the motor in pulses. During one pulse, the battery is connected and furnishes power to the motor; during the succeeding pulse, the battery is disconnected completely from the motor and the output from the energizer is applied across the terminals of the battery.
If frequency content, spin-hole content, etc. are properly constructed by the energizer, then the ion movements in the battery reverse themselves, recharging the battery. Again, remember that these ions MOVE THEMSELVES during this recharge phase. Specifically, we are NOT furnishing ordinary current to the battery, and we are not doing work on it from the energizer.
If things are built properly, the battery can be made to more than recover its charge during this pulse cycle. To prevent excess charge of the battery and overheating and destroying it, a sensor is added which senses the state of charge of the battery, and furnishes a feedback signal to the controller to regulate the length of recharge time per “power off” pulse. In other words, the system is now self-regulating.
The relation between power pulses and recharge pulses is shown on the graphs at the bottom. Note that regulation may decrease the time of recharge application of the del-phi river.
This system, if properly built and tuned, will furnish “free shaft energy” continually, without violating conservation of anenergy. Remember that the del-phi condition across the battery terminals means that spacetime is suddenly curved there, and conservation of energy need no longer apply.
Again, this system is consistent with general relativity and with the fact that O-field alone can drive a situation relativistic. We have deliberately used these facts to do direct engineering. Our “extra energy” comes from shifting phi-flux — the energy of the universal vacuum spacetime — directly into ordinary energy for our use. Thus we draw on an inexhaustible source, and our device is no more esoteric than a paddlewheel in a river. The only difference is that, in this case, we have to be clever enough to make and divert the river in the right timing sequency.
This is a free energy device which an ordinary person, who knows a little electronics, can experiment with in the basement. To develop it, one is talking several thousands of dollars and a lot of persistence and tinkering; one is not talking millions.
# BEDINI’S ENERGY GENERATOR, Copyright © 1996, http://www.icehouse.net/john34/foreward.html
Bedini’s demonstration was followed by Jim Watson, a research scientist living in Colorado Springs.Watson presented two working devices similar to John Bedini’s. The smaller device was running during Watson’s entire presentation and the audience could verify that the battery was being recharged constantly. The larger device, which weighed 800 pounds, was demonstrated only for 10 minutes due to practical reasons. During this time a constant load of 12kw could be withdrawn from the device. The device itself was powered by two 12v car batteries. Jim sold us all out, and I have moved on to other things.
FOREWORD
Imagine having a small D.C. electrical motor sitting on your laboratory bench powered by a common 12 volt battery. Imagine starting with a fully charged battery and connecting it to the motor with no other power input. Obviously, the motor is going to run off the battery, but by conventional thinking it will stop when the battery runs down.
Impossible, you say. Not at all. That’s precisely what I have done and the motor is running now in my workshop.
It isn’t running by the conventional wisdom of electrical physics. It isn’t running by the conventional rules of electric motors and generators, but it is running.
It isn’t something complex. It is pretty simple, once one gets the hang of the basic idea.
It is running off the principles of electromagnetics that Nikola Tesla discovered shortly before 1900 in his Colorado Springs experiments. It is running off the fact that empty vacuum – pure “emptiness”, so to speak – is filled with rivers and oceans of seething energy, just as Nikola Tesla pointed out.
It is running off the fact that vacuum space-time itself is nothing but pure massless charge. That is, vcuum has a very high electrostatic scalar potential – it is greatly stressed. To usefully tap the enormous locked-in energy of that stress, all one has to do is crack it sharply and tap the vacuum oscillations that result. The best way to do that is to hit something resonant that is imbedded in the vacuum, then tap the resonant stress of the ringing of the vacuum itself
In other words, we can ring something at its resonant frequency and, if that something is imbedded in the vacuum, we can tap off the resonance in vacuum stress, without tapping energy directly from the embedded system we rang into oscillation, So what we really need is something that is deeply imbedded in the vacuum, that is, something that can translate “vacuum” movement to “mass” movement.
Well, all charged particles and ions are already imbedded in the vacuum by their charged fluxes, so stressed oscillations – that is, vacuum oscillations – can be converted into normal energy of mass movement by charged particles or ions, if the system of charged particles or ions is made to resonate in phase with our tapping “potential”. For our purpose, let’s use a system of ions.
First we will need a big accumulator to hold a lot of the charged ions in the system that we wish to shock into oscillation. We need something that has a big capacitance and also contains a lot of ions.
An ordinary battery filled with electrolyte fits the bill nicely. While it is not commonly known, ordinary lead-acid storage batteries have a resonant ionic frequency, usually in the range of from 1-6 MHz. All we have to do is shock-oscillate the ions in the electrolyte at their resonant frequency and time our “trigger”potential and “siphon” current correctly. Then if we keep adding potential to trigger the system we can get all that “potential” to translate into “free electrical energy”.
Look at it this way. Conventionally “electrostatic scalar potential” is composed of work or energy per column of charged particle mass. So if we add potential alone, without the mass flow, to a system of oscillating charged particles, we add “physical energy” in the entire charged particle system. In other words, the “potential” we add is converted directly into “ordinary energy” by the imbedded ions in the system. If we are clever we don’t have to furnish any pushing energy to move pure potential around. (For proof that this is possible, see Bearden’s “Toward a New Electromagnetics; Part IV; Vectors and Mechanisms Clarified”, Tesla Book Co,, 1983, Slide 19, page 43, and the accompanying write-up, pages 10,11. Also see Y. Aharonov and V. Bohm, “Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory”, “Physical Review”, Second Series, Vol. 115, No. 3, Aug 1, 1959, pages 485-491. On page 490 you will find that it’s possible to have a field-free region of space, and still have the potential determine the physical properties of the system.)
Now this “free energy resonant coupling” can be done in a simple, cheap system. You don’t need big cyclotrons and huge laboratories to do it; you can do it with ordinary D.C. motors, batteries, controllers and trigger circuits.
And that’s exactly what I have done. It’s real. It works. It is running now on my laboratory bench in prototype form.
But that’s not all. I am also a humanitarian. I am concerned for that little old widow lady at the end of the lane, stretching her meager Social Security check as far as she can, shivering in the cold winter and not daring to turn up her furnace because she can’t afford the frightful utility bills.
That’s simply got to change and I may well be the fellow who changes it. By openly releasing my work in this paper, I am providing enough information for all the tinkerers and independent inventors around the world to have at it. If I can get a thousand of them to duplicate my device, it simply can’t be suppressed as so many others have been.
So here it is. I have deliberately written my paper for the tinkerer and experimenter, not for the scientist. You must be careful, for the device is a little tricky to adjust in and synchronize all the resonances. You’ll have to fiddle with it, but it will work. Keep at it.
Also, we warn you not to play with this unless you know what you are doing. The resonating battery electrolyte produces hydrogen, and if you hit it too hard with a “voltage spike” you can get an electrical spark inside the battery. If that happens, the battery will explode, so don’t mess with it unless you are qualified and use the utmost caution.
But it does work. So all you experimenters and pioneers, now’s your chance. Have at it. Build it. Tinker with it. Fiddle it into resonant operation. Then let’s build this thing in quantity, sell it widely, and get those home utilities down to where we can all afford them – including the shivering little old lady at the end of the lane.
And when we do, let’s give men like me the credit and appreciation they so richly deserve.
The Institute Of Electrical And Electronics Engineers, Inc
John C Bedini has constructed a laboratory model of a machine in which output energy exceeds input. It consists of a lead-acid battery which powers a small DC motor, which turns a magneto-like dynamo, which provides output energy to an electronics package, which in turn feeds timed (scalar?) pulses back to the battery terminals for recharging. As a demonstration, Bedini then removes the good battery and sequentially inserts fully discharged, dead batteries. Each of the dead batteries eventually receives a full charge. Stated differently, He starts with one good battery and four discharged batteries. At the end of the demonstration all five batteries are fully charged. This author has personally visited Bedini’s lab many times , in company with technicians and professors of Physics and Electrical Engineering. None of us has been able to fault Bedini’s findings. Each of my professorial friends, however, has requested that their names not be used for attribution, the inference being that their respective universities would not be understanding of heretical concepts.
# Other diagram of Motor/Energizer/Generators on Bedini’s ‘old website’ http://www.icehouse.net/john34/idea.html
# See also: http://www.icehouse.net/john34/kromrey.html